This is a movie that the statement "people will either love it or hate it" does not apply to.
I'm sure some will love it, and some will hate it. But I think a good majority will fall somewhere in between. Like myself.
Overall, it's not a bad movie. But the problem is that it's greatest strength is at the same time its greatest weakness- the storytelling.
Visually, it is stunning. The acting, when taken in context of just itself, is excellent (Rorschach in particular, OMG he's AWESOME).
The sex scenes... (yes, there are 3 of them).. if you are male, and/or like to see such things, you will be in heaven.
If you don't (such as myself- that's why I have the playboy channel, thank you), be prepared. The first one isn't so bad. It takes a little too long to get to the point for MY taste, but it is actually a necessary part of the story, so I don't begrudge the movie that one. The second one is longer than the first, partly story based, and partly gratuitous, though it doesn't get that far. The third one is nothing but gratuitousness. (literally, think the sex scene in 300 between the king and his wife, except LONGER). If this sort of thing ruins movies for you, you are now warned.
Now, what made the movie great was the storytelling concerning the characters. You cared about the characters and who they are, and why they did what they did (well, except for the one with the blue cat- they really didn't deal with him a whole lot).
Unfortunately, that is exactly what made the movie disappointing- the storytelling for most of the characters was so great, that the actual plot of the movie felt more like a hollow afterthought, as did the character with the blue cat. You cared about the rest of the characters, but didn't really give a rats ass what they did in relation to the rest of the world. The threat of nuclear war really didn't feel like it was anywhere near as urgent as it was supposed to be, and it really did seem like the only people worried about it were the government, and the heroes. No one else really seemed all that concerned. It was almost like they felt they had to throw in some kind of plot to justify telling the stories of most of the characters! (I'm hoping -guessing?- that this is not the case in the actual book, and seems to be a little of what I am hearing, so apparently, that part did NOT translate well at all)
My husband and I were talking about it, and I was sort of comparing it to kingdom come (which, if they ever did that as a movie, it would totally SMOKE watchmen!), and he said that in a way, watchmen was a lot like kingdom come in that the heroes had a big decision to make, and that is was sort of the same thing but from a different perspective.
Which, i can kind of see, but in the movie, at least, that "decision" as it were, wasn't covered until the last maybe 20 minutes of the movie, it didn't feel like there was any real weight to it, and then after that, there was absolutely nothing that gave any indication of the consequences or effects of that decision, on either the characters, or the world.
Had the movie been twice as long, or had it been about JUST the characters, it would have been spectacular.
But as it was, it was so great in telling the stories of all but the one character, that the rest of the movie just fell incredibly flat and felt so hollow and almost pointless, making the whole thing rather disappointing.
So much so, that it doesn't even inspire me to read the graphic novel at all! I probably will, someday, but the movie really did not make me want to at all.
Anyway, that's just my few cents.
-LC
Devious Comments
I completely disagree with you about the attachment to characters. The only character I felt for was Rorschach. So I'm with the critics in this particular field.
As for the main thesis of the movie itself, it was lost I think due to the lack of real-world merit for anyone who, like me, was a toddler during the ass end of the Cold War.
I've read the graphic novel and the immediate relation to the problem at hand is completely lost in the movie. When the book came out, it was relevant. It's not so relevant now because well...we got outta the Cold War front without something massively disastrous happening that the book was suggestive in its theme.
The movie will make money, it's not going up against anything anyway. Although, I'm surprised to say, it could've done well during the summer months, I'm a little confused as to why the studios decided to release it in the Spring quarter (which is usually a death-sentence for any movie, meaning...even the studios thought the movie sucked).
Good review though
--
[link]
[link]
If things turn out as planned, I'll be seeing it this afternoon. Then I should be able to give my opinion on it.
From the trailers, etc. the cinematography seems to be excellent and fairly decent character development. But then again trailers are designed to put people's butts in the seats, and more than once I've been let down by movies whose best part WAS the trailer.
Given the length of this film, I have to agree that a summer release may have done it more justice. Being the comic geek that I am, I will pick up the graphic novel and make whatever favorable or unfavorable comparisons then.
--
Quis custodiet ispsos custodes?
--
Remember, Truth is just an excuse for lack of imagination.
"Don't hate the actors for being good at the lies they tell. Hate the audience for believing it."
--Me
As for the main plot, or thesis as you so eloquently put it, I don't think it's lost so much in being relevant, what with the whole war thing we've currently got going to take everyone else's WMDs, and how many people don't like the war, etc, so much as that relevance is a bit lost in the context for exactly the reason you mentioned- a lot of us didn't grow up during the whole cold war thing.
On the flip side, though, it is sort of an "alternate period piece" so that may not really be a problem for some. (Similar to V for Vendetta, just not as drastically different an alternate reality.) Of course, I'm the type who doesn't normally look for relevance in the movies I see either, just entertainment. I can see it, and if it's pointed out -like you did with this one- I can comment on that, but it's not something I normally pay attention to. Though it does tend to make discussions interesting when talking to someone who does notice it and pay attention to it.
Either way, relevant or not, my main thing was just that it was lost regardless because the excellence of the storytelling for the characters was seriously not there for the plot.
And I am guessing they released it now because it had already been pushed back from what I understand, so they didn't want to wait any more; the fact there there isn't really anything to compete with it I think is just a fortuitous bonus.
--
Remember, Truth is just an excuse for lack of imagination.
"Don't hate the actors for being good at the lies they tell. Hate the audience for believing it."
--Me
I'm sure after seeing the movie and reading the novel I'll be full of opinions. (I'm usually far too full of them to keep them to myself.) However, I will say that right off the bat that Jeffrey Dean Morgan as the Comedian was an excellent casting choice.
--
Quis custodiet ispsos custodes?
--
Remember, Truth is just an excuse for lack of imagination.
"Don't hate the actors for being good at the lies they tell. Hate the audience for believing it."
--Me
--
Quis custodiet ispsos custodes?
--
Remember, Truth is just an excuse for lack of imagination.
"Don't hate the actors for being good at the lies they tell. Hate the audience for believing it."
--Me
Great stuff. Better than cable!!!
--
Quis custodiet ispsos custodes?
Previous Page12Next Page